W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > January 2003

RE: Myth of loose coupling

From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 08:15:51 -0700
Message-ID: <9A4FC925410C024792B85198DF1E97E404B6DC9B@usmsg03.sagus.com>
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Jacques Dubray [mailto:jjd@eigner.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 10:11 AM
> To: 'Champion, Mike'; www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Myth of loose coupling
> 
 
> It would certainly help to elevate the debate at the 
> metamodel level and
> establish a mapping to technological concepts such as GET, 
> URI and POST.
> A picture being worth more than a thousand words on this list, I would
> suggest to illustrate it with UML class diagrams.

That sounds like a good way forward!  Sure, anyone want to propose some
pictures?  And don't even THINK about starting a tangential thread on the
value of UML :-)  Don't like UML, draw some other picture using whatever
discipline you want. 
Received on Wednesday, 8 January 2003 10:16:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:12 GMT