W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > January 2003

Re: Semantic Web needed for RESTful Web services? (RE: Binding)

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 18:18:02 +0600
Message-ID: <003501c2b70f$ffaf82c0$6f00a8c0@lankabook2>
To: "Peter Furniss" <peter.furniss@choreology.com>, <edwink@collaxa.com>
Cc: <www-ws-arch@w3.org>

"Peter Furniss" <peter.furniss@choreology.com> writes:
> > basically "implementation defined." That's clearly non-interoperable
> > and hence would need to be fixed.
> 
> Surely it is interoperable, precisely because only one side has anything
> to do with it.  However, it is non-portable.

Thank you for the clarification; I stand corrected.

> Of course, this is just the choreography:orchestration,
> interface/implementation
> issue again.

Yes I guess so - whether the language is a portable implementation
language or not.

Sanjiva.
Received on Wednesday, 8 January 2003 07:20:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:12 GMT