Re: Semantic Web needed for RESTful Web services? (RE: Binding)

"Peter Furniss" <peter.furniss@choreology.com> writes:
> > basically "implementation defined." That's clearly non-interoperable
> > and hence would need to be fixed.
> 
> Surely it is interoperable, precisely because only one side has anything
> to do with it.  However, it is non-portable.

Thank you for the clarification; I stand corrected.

> Of course, this is just the choreography:orchestration,
> interface/implementation
> issue again.

Yes I guess so - whether the language is a portable implementation
language or not.

Sanjiva.