W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > January 2003

RE: Semantic Web needed for RESTful Web services? (RE: Binding)

From: Edwin Khodabakchian <edwink@collaxa.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 11:27:30 -0800
To: "'Sanjiva Weerawarana'" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Message-ID: <008401c2b682$d2364190$1802a8c0@collaxa.net>

Sanjiva,

Thank you for the clarification.

Does this also apply if the exception is related to the fact that the
service is not available or the version of the interface has changed or
any other exception that is not explicitely advertized by the remote
service as a business fault?

Thank you,

Edwin


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 11:14 AM
> To: edwink@collaxa.com; www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Semantic Web needed for RESTful Web services? 
> (RE: Binding)
> 
> 
> Hi Edwin,
> 
> > What happens when an exception occurs? Are local/remote exceptions 
> > transparent to developers? Does BPWS4J have support for the 
> notion of 
> > RemoteExceptions (I am not talking about SOAP Faults)?
> 
> The only thing I know about the other side is its WSDL. So 
> when a fault occurs on the other side then one of the faults 
> listed in the WSDL will come down the wire (as a SOAP:Fault 
> if service is invoked using SOAP). 
> 
> Those faults then become BPEL exceptions and are propagated / 
> handled by the process as indicated in the process.
> 
> Sanjiva.
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 7 January 2003 14:27:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:12 GMT