W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > January 2003

RE: A different binding example (was RE: Binding)

From: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 17:47:14 -0800
Message-ID: <A60C40997573F04C8D778D1B5D799C3B20D349@mail2002.stc.com>
To: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@softwareag-usa.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>

It looks like the WSD WG has not spent much time in those areas so far. (The HTTP Binding section is still just a cut and paste from WSDL 1.1).

I suspect the Web Method Feature will fall under the current discussion on how to define SOAP Features in WSDL.

Ugo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Champion, Mike [mailto:Mike.Champion@softwareag-usa.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 4:26 PM
> To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: A different binding example (was RE: Binding)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ugo Corda [mailto:UCorda@SeeBeyond.com]
> > Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 6:47 PM
> > To: edwink@collaxa.com; www-ws-arch@w3.org
> > Subject: RE: A different binding example (was RE: Binding)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Wouldn't that be a WSDL HTTP Binding that you are talking about?
> 
> What is the status of WSDL 1.2's support for HTTP GET, or the 
> webmethod
> feature of SOAP 1.2? 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 6 January 2003 20:47:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:12 GMT