James M Snell wrote: > The term "business protocols" as I've been using it would encompass the > broad family of technology-independent business protocols available. > RosettaNet PIP 3A4, ebXML BPSS would all fall under this category so we're > not usurping anything. Sorry about the word "usurp", sounded like an accusation. If you use the same word for the technology-independent business protocol and also the technical implementations, won't that be confusing?Received on Thursday, 27 February 2003 17:33:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:15 GMT