W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > February 2003

Re: SOAP message infoset

From: <jones@research.att.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 10:48:38 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200302181548.KAA20544@bual.research.att.com>
To: chrisfer@us.ibm.com, www-ws-arch@w3.org


Sorry I missed Noah's early posting in January before our task
force telcon on the topic.

I wasn't suggesting going in a direction counter to the SOAP WG.
My point is that the model has architectural implications.  Also, if
the SOAP group thought the idea had some merit and might be an
appropriate consideration for follow-on work in SOAP, it would also
be in-scope for us since we have a role in (re-)chartering decisions.

I've heard Noah comment on this a number of times, and I think his
sentiments were more along the lines of "too late for SOAP 1.2" and
"interesting, but would need more investigation".  In any case, there
is no consensus yet in XMLP to be "counter to".


Mark A. Jones
AT&T Labs -- Strategic Standards Division
Shannon Laboratory
Room 2A02
180 Park Ave.
Florham Park, NJ  07932-0971

email: jones@research.att.com
phone: (973) 360-8326
  fax: (973) 236-6453

	To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
	From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
	Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 09:31:59 -0500
	Subject: Re: SOAP message infoset

	Christopher Ferris
	Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
	email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
	phone: +1 508 234 3624

	Mark Jones wrote on 02/14/2003 03:15:22 PM:

	> Even if the XMLP group does not endorse this model for integration
	> into its SOAP 1.2 work, it seems like the ideas are worth considering
	> from an architectural point of view and of possible relevance to
	> follow-on work in SOAP.

	Hmmm... I'm not so certain I'd agree. I think that Noah's post[1] on this
	subject should have been referenced as well. I don't thinks we should 
	consider going in a direction that is counter to that of a sister WG. I 
	it sets a dangerous precedent.

	[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2003Jan/0059.html
Received on Tuesday, 18 February 2003 10:49:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:41:03 UTC