W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > February 2003

Re: Layers in the WSA (was RE: [Fwd: UN/CEFACT TMG Releases e-Bus ines s Architecture Technical Specification for Public Review])

From: Duane Nickull <duane@xmlglobal.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:51:22 -0800
Message-ID: <3E4C135A.9060203@xmlglobal.com>
To: "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>
Cc: "'Champion, Mike'" <Mike.Champion@softwareag-usa.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org

David et al:

I don't know if this would match the convention of our WSA document, but 
it may be an idea to have the section in the doc describe the 
functionality of the component, its' interfaces and formal functional 
constraints, then add a small non-normative section that may discuss any 
specifications or technologies that could  be investigated for use as 
that component.

The downside is that this may age the WSA doc if those specs change.


Burdett, David wrote:
> I agree, but do we call out a list of specific features anywhere? ... 
> and if we did, should we say anything about the dependencies between 
> them (which there surely are) and how they would/could be composed together?
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2003 16:51:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:41:03 UTC