> > There > > are limitations to HTTP that can be ameliorated by the use of SOAP. In > > cases of Service-oriented applications, such as messaging systems, it is > > easier to build applications in an SOA style. > > I have to disagree there. I've yet to see a SOA app that wasn't far > simpler to develop than a REST based app. Did you mean "more complex"? And yet it's claimed that REST style, while not necessarily easy, has longer term payoffs. Can we come up with a consistent analysis of SOA vs REST, simple vs complex, easy vs hard, short-term vs long-term? Or else maybe just drop the analysis from the proposed text? WaldenReceived on Thursday, 13 February 2003 10:53:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:14 GMT