Re: [ISSUES] Issue #10 - proposed resolution

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:14 GMT

Excellent, I will link to this definition in my response.

                      "Hugo Haas"                                                                                                 
                      <hugo@w3.org>            To:       Daniel_Austin@grainger.com                                               
                      Sent by:                 cc:       www-ws-arch@w3.org                                                       
                      www-ws-arch-reque        Subject:  Re: [ISSUES] Issue #10 - proposed resolution                             
                      st@w3.org                                                                                                   

                      02/05/2003 05:42                                                                                            
                      AM                                                                                                          

[ Reducing the recipients list. ]

* Daniel_Austin@grainger.com <Daniel_Austin@grainger.com> [2003-02-03
16:02-0600]
>       Also, in regard to your comment on non-repudiation; the Working
Group
> does not intend to require particular algorithms for non-repudiation, but
> we agree that a definition of the term should occur in the WS Glossary
> document.

As a matter of fact, it already does:

  http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-ws-gloss-20021114/#nonrepudiation

Regards,

Hugo

--
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/