- From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 13:41:54 +0100
- To: "Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)" <RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
* Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com> [2003-02-03 13:27-0600]
> It seems to me that the separation of the glossary into functional
> sections (Architecture, General, Roles, etc) has some problems of
> consistency. Some terms might apply to more than one section. And,
> conversely (I think), some closely related terms migh split between
> sections in a way that makes their relationship less clear.
I originally tried to categorize terms to make the document clearer,
but I agree with you that it is not perfect.
> Suggestions:
>
> 1 - Use some fancy client-side script technique that will reorder the
> terms either by category or overall alphabetically.
>
> 2 - Order the main table alphabetically but provide a separate list by
> category that links to the alphabetic list. Could one write an XSL
> stylesheet that would automate this? (Probably depends on who the "one"
> is and how consistently the main table is tagged, I guess).
All your suggestions seem to be tools to achieve two orderings for the
document: one by category, one alphabetically.
We have the tools for doing so (DOM, XSLT, ...), but I think that one
thing that we should first agree on is a set of categories which makes
sense.
As you said, the current one is sub-optimal, and it seems that it will
be hard to limit every term to only one category.
The current list is[1]:
2 Architectural Terms
3 General Terms
4 Choreography definitions
5 Roles
6 Service Properties
7 SOAP Specific Definitions
7.1 Protocol Concepts
7.2 Data Encapsulation Concepts
7.3 Message Sender and Receiver Concepts
8 Security and Privacy Related Terms
9 Management Terms
The difference between 2, 3 and 5 is blurry. 4 may have to go back
into the {2,3,5} set at some point. 6, 7, 8 and 9 seem to be good
separate categories on the other hand.
Maybe we could look into reuniting {2,3,5}, give it a name, and see if
it would make more sense.
Regards,
Hugo
1. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/arch/glossary/wsa-glossary.html
--
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2003 07:41:58 UTC