> -----Original Message----- > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com] > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 4:20 PM > To: www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: Re: XML and SOAP constraints? (was RE: WSA constraints) > > > BPEL4WS layers on WSDL without assuming specific bindings (SOAP or > XML for that matter) and provides a composition (choreography) model > that works just fine. The on-the-wire stuff for BPEL can be > anything .. > and our implementation (on alphaWorks) supports SOAP, Java method > calls and RMI/IIOP as "on-the-wire" serializations. > The WS-Desc WG agreed at the last F2F to not preclude non-XML > bindings. However, we are not planning on doing any non-XML bindings > on our own. Thanks for the clarifications. Interesting ... I'd guess that something along the line of "not preclude non-XML (infoset) definitions and messages, but not actively support them" might be a good way forward for us. > I'm sorry for opening a can of worms. Not at all! This issue has been festering for months, and we need to figure out what to say about it.Received on Monday, 23 September 2002 16:50:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:06 GMT