W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > September 2002

RE: WSA diffs from REST

From: Katia Sycara <katia@cs.cmu.edu>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 13:05:45 -0400
To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
Message-ID: <NFBBLCDGGLCHCHFEJFIGMEBNCIAA.katia@cs.cmu.edu>

+1

--Katia

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of David Orchard
Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 9:20 PM
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: WSA diffs from REST



Here, here.  Definitely agreed with Mike.  We should get an architecture
document published to any and all interested parties for review.   I'm far
more concerned about progress the state of web services than looking for a
review from one particular group.

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Champion, Mike
> Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 11:59 AM
> To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: WSA diffs from REST
>
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org]
> > Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 2:19 PM
> > To: David Orchard
> > Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: WSA diffs from REST
> >
> > I suggest that my list of accepted constraints (modulo rephrasing to
> > remove the references to REST), plus your XML one, and any
> others that
> > WG thinks are there, would be sufficient.
>
> I think our job is to consider the the constraints of the web
> itself, as we
> in this WG understand it, in the light of whatever
> authoritative findings
> that the TAG comes up with as we are working.  These
> constraints will be
> considered in light of other constraints defined by our
> Requirements, the
> actual web services work going on, etc. I see no urgency to
> cull out the
> web-specific constraints, only to develop a coherent picture in in the
> actual WSA document.
>
> > As I've said, my only objective is to provide a means
> whereby the TAG
> > can quickly and accurately compare Web services with the Web.
>
> My opinion, which I believe is more or less shared by most of
> the other
> editors and the co-chair, is that the TAG has already made
> its opinion known
> on that subject in the discussion about GET in SOAP 1.2.  SOAP 1.2 has
> accomodated the TAG's issue to the satisfaction of both the
> XMLP WG and the
> TAG.  We have clear direction on the relationship between web
> services and
> the Web, that sketched out in SOAP 1.2, and our job is to flesh out a
> reference architecture that accomodates this, WSDL, SOAP as actually
> practiced, and numerous other inputs.
>
> I personally would not welcome an early occasion where "the
> TAG can quickly
> and accurately compare Web services with the Web."  They can of course
> review our working drafts of the WSA document itself and make
> their opinion
> known as it takes shape, and specific feedback -- such as
> they gave XMLP
> last spring -- would be welcome, but I would appreciate
> having the time to
> get good consensus in the WG around the WSA document before
> that happens.
>
>
>
Received on Sunday, 22 September 2002 13:06:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:06 GMT