W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > October 2002

RE: Definition of Choreography

From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 14:56:19 -0600
Message-ID: <9A4FC925410C024792B85198DF1E97E4043AEF06@usmsg03.sagus.com>
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
I don't feel as strongly as Dave Orchard that this discussion is leading
towards "yet another choreography language", but I would appreciate a
summary of what we have learned from the discussion about the REQUIREMENTS
and SCOPE of a W3C WS Choreography language.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ricky Ho [mailto:riho@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 4:25 PM
To: jzhu@silkvalleytech.com; www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: Definition of Choreography

If you want to use 2 async one-way requests style rather that 1 sync
request/reply style, then the following will be my representation.
<choreography name="Purchase" startState="waitForPOState">  

Rgds, Ricky

At 12:47 PM 10/21/2002 -0700, Jianhua Zhu wrote:

How about...
<choreography name="Purchase" startState="waitForPOState">
Received on Monday, 21 October 2002 16:56:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:41:00 UTC