I don't feel as strongly as Dave Orchard that this discussion is leading towards "yet another choreography language", but I would appreciate a summary of what we have learned from the discussion about the REQUIREMENTS and SCOPE of a W3C WS Choreography language. -----Original Message----- From: Ricky Ho [mailto:riho@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 4:25 PM To: jzhu@silkvalleytech.com; www-ws-arch@w3.org Subject: RE: Definition of Choreography If you want to use 2 async one-way requests style rather that 1 sync request/reply style, then the following will be my representation. <choreography name="Purchase" startState="waitForPOState"> [snip] </choreography> Rgds, Ricky At 12:47 PM 10/21/2002 -0700, Jianhua Zhu wrote: How about... <choreography name="Purchase" startState="waitForPOState"> [snip] </choreography>Received on Monday, 21 October 2002 16:56:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:09 GMT