W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > October 2002

RE: Gateways

From: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 11:42:51 -0700
Message-ID: <C513FB68F8200244B570543EF3FC65370A855B82@MAIL1.stc.com>
To: "'Champion, Mike'" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org

That would be fine with me.


-----Original Message-----
From: Champion, Mike [mailto:Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 11:39 AM
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: Gateways

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ugo Corda [mailto:UCorda@SeeBeyond.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 2:27 PM
> To: 'Mark Baker'
> Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Gateways
> To be honest, I still feel that the definition of what is a 
> gateway vs. what is an intermediary is not clearly cut.

My advice, wearing my co-chair hat but not speaking for Dave,
is that getting some decent wording with an editorial note 
containing a minority opinion or some concerns to sort out when
we can look at it afresh, is the best way forward at this
Received on Tuesday, 8 October 2002 14:43:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:41:00 UTC