W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > November 2002

Re: [wss] Issue on WS-Security and WSDL definitions

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 22:01:14 -0500 (EST)
To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
cc: "wss@lists.oasis-open.org" <wss@lists.oasis-open.org>, "www-ws-arch@w3.org" <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0211112159090.21711-100000@smtp.datapower.com>


Dave,

I'm not current on WSDL 1.2, but can you explain a bit how WSDL fits
in here?  It seems to me that a stand-alone specification should just
define the semantics of its elements.  If an application wants those
semantics, then the application WSDL should specify the header as
being required.

What am I missing?
	/r$

Received on Monday, 11 November 2002 22:01:15 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Geoff Arnold: "Introduction"
Previous message: Heather Kreger: "Proposals from MTF for F2F"
In reply to: David Orchard: "Issue on WS-Security and WSDL definitions"
Next in thread: David Orchard: "RE: [wss] Issue on WS-Security and WSDL definitions"
Reply: David Orchard: "RE: [wss] Issue on WS-Security and WSDL definitions"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:10 GMT