W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > May 2002

RE: [USTF] Goals objectives and strategy (was Agenda for May 30, 2002)

From: Darran Rolls <Darran.Rolls@waveset.com>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 09:22:40 -0500
Message-ID: <6244FCD1F88EC14BACDD2A319FD338242DC64B@hawaii.waveset.com>
To: "Dilber, Ayse, ALASO" <adilber@att.com>, "Dave Hollander" <dmh@contivo.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>

On yesterdays call it was stated that this group is responsible for
"coordinating" the "use cases" (usual caveat) across the WS activity.
That said, we should add a goal to that effect.  How about the

"... to coordinate the presentation of a consistent set of use cases
across the WS activity."

On the naming question, personally I have no problem with DaveO's
current names.  IMHO, the most important thing here is consistency.  It
appears that "usage scenarios" has been widely used to denote the "lower
level" cases so we should stick with that.  If there is contention on
using the word "application" for the "higher level" descriptions, then
how about adopting the term "Sample web services".

Darran Rolls                      http://www.waveset.com
Waveset Technologies Inc          drolls@waveset.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: Dilber, Ayse, ALASO [mailto:adilber@att.com] 
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 8:30 AM
To: Dave Hollander; www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: [USTF] Agenda for May 30, 2002

After pondering over yesterday's discussion regarding our goals,
strategy and objectives for the USTF, I'd like to suggest the following:

Goal:  define usage scenarios (we can debate over the terminology) to
verify set of requirements for a standard reference architecture for Web
Services developed by the WS Arch. WG.

- define stake holders
- identify applications (i.e., reliable messaging, security, EAI, etc.)
to be used in usage scenarios
- leverage Desc. WG's protocol usage scenarios
- influence WS-I defined usage scenarios to enhance WS interoperability

- drive the development of WS usage scenarios that includes
- ensure that the usage scenarios integrate architectural requirements

Any thoughts?

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Hollander [mailto:dmh@contivo.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 4:02 PM
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: [USTF] Agenda for May 30, 2002

The usage scenarios telcon directly following WG telcon. 
Same teleconference number, so just hang on the line 
while the other members drop off. 

0. Review minutes[1] and agenda.

1. Action Items
  1) Chair develop attendance list. Chris to send his list. 
  2) Liaison with non W3C groups on future agenda (Chris). 
  3) Bring up other groups involvement in the task force with the next
  4) (Chris) add usage scenario editorial work to June F2F agenda. 
  5) Future action item to review completeness of our usage scenarios. 
  6) Next agenda - categorization of the functional use cases. (Hao He -
5/22/2002 email) 

2. Schedule
   May 31  - publish shapshot of editors draft
   July 5  - snapshot
   July 26 - snapshot
   Oct 11  - publish WD

3. Presentation (30 min) and Q/A (30 min) at F2F

4. Goals and Objectives
5. review and consider
   * draft documents [2] [3] [4]
6. Next Steps
   * How to get move ahead with preparing July 5 snapshot.


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002May/0338.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002May/0006.html
[3] http://www.w3.org/2002/04/17-ws-usecase.html
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002May/0323.html

Dave Hollander
dmh @ contivo.com
Received on Friday, 31 May 2002 10:23:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:40:56 UTC