On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 07:16:43AM -0400, Christopher Ferris wrote: > right, let's try this on for size: > > <proposal> > "New Web Services technologies, developed by W3C Web > Services WGs, SHOULD be capable of being mapped to RDF/XML." > </proposal> I suggest that if we're going with "SHOULD" (which I'm ok with), that we might as well just say this; "New Web Services technologies, developed by W3C Web Services WGs, SHOULD be mapped to RDF." Note that I also snipped out "/XML". If you map it to the RDF model, you can use any of a number of syntaxes, including XML. MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.comReceived on Wednesday, 22 May 2002 10:15:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:24:59 GMT