- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 10:24:22 -0400
- To: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
- Cc: Katia Sycara <katia@cs.cmu.edu>, "'wsawg public'" <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 07:16:43AM -0400, Christopher Ferris wrote: > right, let's try this on for size: > > <proposal> > "New Web Services technologies, developed by W3C Web > Services WGs, SHOULD be capable of being mapped to RDF/XML." > </proposal> I suggest that if we're going with "SHOULD" (which I'm ok with), that we might as well just say this; "New Web Services technologies, developed by W3C Web Services WGs, SHOULD be mapped to RDF." Note that I also snipped out "/XML". If you map it to the RDF model, you can use any of a number of syntaxes, including XML. MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2002 10:15:56 UTC