W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > May 2002

D-AC011 discussion points and proposal

From: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 13:38:51 -0400
Message-ID: <3CEA862B.7040907@sun.com>
To: wsawg public <www-ws-arch@w3.org>

IBM: Needs to say 'should be consistent with the existing web'.

We must be careful with absolutes.
As I've commented before, we should not be arbitrarily inconsistent,
nor should we introduce inconsistency without extreme due diligence.
However, we are standardizing a new capability to the web therefore
the 'new' things may be inconsistent with the exisiting simply because
they don't exist today.

Would adoption of the wording as proposed above be acceptable?
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2002 13:41:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:40:56 UTC