D-AC020.1 discussion points

MSFT: While this has a place among the requirements for a WS architecture,
it's subordination to the reference architecture obliges us to requenst
more discurssion.

WVST: +1 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-wsa-ballots/2002May/0220.html

HP: The wording is problematic. Suggest:

It must be possible for a service consumer to ascertain the privacy policies
of a web service.

And now this seems to be more of a requirement than a CSF.

ORCL: Shouldn't this be stated as a requirement. A service consumer
MUST be able to deterimine the privacy policies .....

PF: I don't understand this.  How can a CSF be phrased as a question?

CMPQ: Seems to require more discussion.  E.g. What is the meaning of
"knowing" the provider's privacy policies?  Having access to them?

Received on Saturday, 4 May 2002 10:03:32 UTC