W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > March 2002

service identification (was: Re: Web Services Definition and XML)

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 01:19:13 +0600
Message-ID: <008a01c1c47b$95732f60$11aa7cca@watson.ibm.com>
To: <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
I meant to send this to the list, not just to David.

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
To: "David Orchard" <david.orchard@bea.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 8:23 AM
Subject: service identification (was: Re: Web Services Definition and XML)


> Hi David,
>
> > Like I argued for URIs, I will also argue for XML in our definition.
This
> > is a show-stopper.
>
> I didn't follow that thread, but it seems to me a service should
> be identified by a QName and not a URI. The reason being that a
> service defines a bunch of things belonging to a single namespace
> and being able to point to specific aspects of that service is
> very useful. That's the approach that WSDL took.
>
> If this has been discussed already then I would appreciate a pointer
> to the thread.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sanjiva.
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2002 14:28:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:24:55 GMT