* michael.mahan@nokia.com <michael.mahan@nokia.com> [2002-06-26 21:36-0400] > Chris asked me to summarize the thread for the telecon. As I see it, > here is what is still standing: [..] > AR00X.4: (this still needs work) > component relationships are described in terms of messages and message > transmission protocols. (original) > OR > relationships between components must be well described > (suggested, I feel this is not enough) I think that there is a terminology problem here. The first proposal suggests that "components" means Web services. I understand the second one as referring to components of the architecture, such as choreography, security. I am happy with the first one, but I think that "components" is a confusing word to use here. And if I got it wrong, then it is more confusing than what I thought. Regards, Hugo -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ - tel:+1-617-452-2092Received on Friday, 28 June 2002 13:12:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:01 GMT