RE: D-AC010.1 proposal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Orchard [mailto:dorchard@bea.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 8:23 PM
> To: 'Champion, Mike'; 'wsawg public'
> Subject: RE: D-AC010.1 proposal
> 
> 
> Methinks that planning for a de jure standard might be a 
> little early.  I'd suggest that the goals/csfs should reflect today's
reality.  
> If dsdl takes off, the group can include it later.

Fair enough -- I certainly don't want to imply that the ISO stuff should be
considered...  I would just be more comfortable if we didn't make it a
requirement to ignore it.  But you're right, we CAN change the requirements
if reality changes.