W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > July 2002

RE: [STF] STF Concall Minutes 7/22/02

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 07:09:35 -0700
To: <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Message-ID: <045d01c2331b$bdf04950$0100007f@beasys.com>

Thanks!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Hugo Haas
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 6:11 AM
> To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [STF] STF Concall Minutes 7/22/02
> 
> 
> 
> * David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com> [2002-07-23 20:47-0700]
> > I think I'd prefer the intra-STF discussions to be done on 
> the public
> > www-ws-arch mailing list.  This is a public working group.  
> Those who want
> > to work "without being distracted by having to respond to 
> public comments to
> > raw ideas or writings meant for STF members only" should 
> have voted for the
> > www-ws-arch group to be a private discussion forum.  I 
> don't necessarily
> > agree with the group's discussions being public, but that's 
> the way it's
> > chartered.
> 
> That is what I was pushing for, but people felt the need of discussing
> uncooked proposals in semi-private area before showing it to the
> Working Group. I had therefore requested the taskfore to copy
> www-archive so that those uncooked proposals are still publically
> archived, even if they aren't distributed to the Working Group yet.
> 
> Since at least one Working Group member outside the taskforce
> expressed his desire to follow those discussions, those discussions
> must be done on the www-ws-arch mailing list as per the Working Group
> charter[1].
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hugo
> 
>   1. http://www.w3.org/2002/07/ws-arch-charter#email
> -- 
> Hugo Haas - W3C
> mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ - 
> tel:+1-617-452-2092
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2002 10:10:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:02 GMT