W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > July 2002

Re: D-AR003.1; wording re transport/transfer

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 12:21:16 -0400
To: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Message-ID: <20020723122116.B14925@www.markbaker.ca>

On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 11:55:13AM -0400, Champion, Mike wrote:
> > I just want it to say what we discussed, even though I still disagree
> > with it strongly, and would even more strongly disagree with 
> > the revised
> > version.
> Perhaps the best way forward would be for Mark to pay careful attention to
> the language in the actual WSA document as it evolves and help us draft
> language that reflects the concerns of his "constituency" rather than asking
> us to re-hash the requirements document.  In the end, it's the WSA spec that
> people will pay attention to, not the requirements doc.

That's true, it's the architecture document that I'm most concerned
about.  If it's what we're going to be asking reviewers (read; the
TAG 8-) to focus on, then I'd be ok with that.  But if we're going to
ask the TAG to review the requirements document, then I'd request this
clarification be made.


Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.               distobj@acm.org
http://www.markbaker.ca        http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2002 12:09:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:40:57 UTC