W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > July 2002

Re: REST, Conversations and Reliability

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 12:42:10 -0400
To: "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>
Cc: "'Champion, Mike'" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
Message-ID: <20020718124209.Q28437@www.markbaker.ca>

On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 09:06:38AM -0700, Burdett, David wrote:
> Mike
> I total agree that a WSA that only built on RPC would not be accepted, as
> you say below.

Perhaps a definition of "RPC" would be helpful.  If you look at
Xmethods.net, they break Web services down into two types; document,
and RPC.  But even the document types are RPC, at least by my
definition, and the definition I understand Mike to be using.

The rule of thumb I've used is; if there is a method name in the SOAP
envelope, then it's RPC.  Because when SOAP is used with an application
protocol, the method comes from the protocol.

Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.               distobj@acm.org
http://www.markbaker.ca        http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 12:30:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:40:57 UTC