W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > July 2002

RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability

From: Burdett, David <david.burdett@commerceone.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 09:06:38 -0700
Message-ID: <C1E0143CD365A445A4417083BF6F42CC053D100A@C1plenaexm07.commerceone.com>
To: "'Champion, Mike'" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
Mike
 
I total agree that a WSA that only built on RPC would not be accepted, as
you say below.
 
David

-----Original Message-----
From: Champion, Mike [mailto:Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 9:01 AM
To: Burdett, David; Champion, Mike; www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability


 

-----Original Message-----
From: Burdett, David [mailto:david.burdett@commerceone.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 11:57 AM
To: 'Champion, Mike'; www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability
 

 

Doesn't SOAP build on the Web? Isn't SOAP 1.2 being developed within the
W3C? Why are you so SURE that the "W3C staff/director/TAG" would not accept
a WSA built primarily on SOAP? 

Oops! Violated my own dictum that "SOAP" != "RPC"

I meant that the W3C staff/director/TAG would not accept a WSA built
primarily on RPC / OMG OMA  principles.  Obviously SOAP 1.2 reflects these
concerns and sorry for the confusion.
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 12:06:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:02 GMT