W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > July 2002

RE: [hst] harvest list (repost from Mon 07/08/2002 05:20 PM)

From: ECKERT,ZULAH (HP-Cupertino,ex1) <zulah_eckert@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 18:35:00 -0400
Message-ID: <580F4ACFCD8F4E439B06B815110418C7887F5C@xcup03.cup.hp.com>
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org


+1

I believe that this was the intent from the Paris F2F. That is to in a short
time period determine and document the architecture for SOAP (XMLP) and WSDL
(the WS description WG) so that we would have atleast this common basis of
understanding within the WSAWG.

Zulah

-----Original Message-----
From: David Orchard [mailto:dorchard@bea.com]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:36 AM
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: [hst] harvest list (repost from Mon 07/08/2002 05:20 PM)



While I'm not on the hst subgroup, I do have a suggestion: why not focus on
SOAP and WSDL for the initial set of harvestable entities?

We would be quite successful (80/20 mark hit) if we produced an architecture
document that - in it's first incarnation - described the architecture of
SOAP and WSDL, how they work together, and how their
extensibility/composability models form the principles of web services
architecture.

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Burdett, David
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 5:28 PM
> To: 'michael.mahan@nokia.com'; www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: [hst] harvest list (repost from Mon 07/08/2002 05:20 PM)
>
>
>
> I'm not sure if we would want to include this, but do we also want to
> analyze the work done in, for example the Java Community
> Program around Web
> Services, (e.g. JAXM) and several others, to determine if they provide
> architectural requirements that we need to consider?
>
> David
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: michael.mahan@nokia.com [mailto:michael.mahan@nokia.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 8:56 AM
> To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: [hst] harvest list (repost from Mon 07/08/2002 05:20 PM)
>
>
>
> [this is a repost to the public list of a message sent earlier
> to the member list]
>
> Hi All,
>
> It seems like there is a concensus to harvest both types of
> architectural
> entities -
> both components/connectors and relevant arch features of the system
> (processing model,
> MEPs, etc.)
>
> Moving on, the current list to harvest:
> 1. SOAP/XMLP
> 2. WSD
> 3. OMG/Corba
> 4. REST
> 5. Meerkat
> 6. XML-RPC
> 7. UDDI
> 8. ebXML
>
> Any others?
>
> Mark Jones mentioned that he is going through the SOAP spec. In the
> democratic
> spirit of divide and conquer, are there volunteers for the other
> systems/specs?
>
> Mike
>
>
Received on Monday, 15 July 2002 18:35:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:02 GMT