W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > July 2002

RE: SOAP and the Web (was RE: Late binding)

From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 12:07:19 -0400
Message-ID: <9A4FC925410C024792B85198DF1E97E403735D04@usmsg03.sagus.com>
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Champion, Mike [mailto:Mike.Champion@softwareag-usa.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:57 AM
> To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: SOAP and the Web (was RE: Late binding)
> but seriously, what is the RESTically correct aproach to the
> transaction/reliability/security/etc. problem? Multiple
> PUT/GETs to establish a shared context within which to interpret
> messages and transaction/transmission state?

That is, mightn't some future standardization of SOAP headers be GET or PUT
as resource representations of the state of the complex transaction in a
RESTful MEP, even though they would be simply POSTed in a more RPC-like MEP?
I'm looking for a web services architecture that shares as much as possible,
even if there continues to be considerable disagreement on the most
effective MEPs. 
Received on Monday, 1 July 2002 12:07:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:40:57 UTC