W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > April 2002

RE: Orchestration (was: W3C Web Service Description WG: Requireme nts)

From: Sadiq, Waqar <waqar.sadiq@eds.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 09:05:01 -0600
Message-ID: <9C79F2D39765D411B18900508BE326A20B728E43@USPLM208>
To: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
Cc: Web Services Private <w3c-ws-desc@w3.org>, Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com, www-ws-arch@w3.org


I am cross-posting this to the architecture group also.  I personally
believe that a description language and orchestration language belong to
different stacks in the web services reference model (none exists yet).  

I believe that orchestration layer adds a level of business intelligence
that leverages the web services layer (described by WSDL) but the two are
not the same.

I vote to defer WSCL to the architecture group for consideration and not
change the scope of what we are doing with WSDL.

Thanks,

 
_______________________________________________
Waqar Sadiq
 
EDS EIT ESAI - Enterprise Consultant
MS: H3-4C-22
5400 Legacy Drive
Plano, Texas 75024
 
phone: +01-972-797-8408 (8-837)
e-mail: waqar.sadiq@eds.com
fax: +01-972-605-4071
_______________________________________________
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr] 
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 2:18 AM
To: Jeffrey Schlimmer
Cc: Web Services Private; Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com
Subject: Orchestration (was: W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements)

[Switching to w3c-ws-desc, since this may touch on member confidential
issues.]

Orchestration brings the question: what are we supposed to do with WSCL [1]?
This does not seem to be considered out-of-scope [2], and the team's comment
was that it should be brought to our attention [3]. Does this indicate a
possible refinent for operations?

Jean-Jacques.

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/wscl10/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/01/ws-desc-charter
[3] http://www.w3.org/Submission/2002/02/Comment

Jeffrey Schlimmer wrote:

> R097: I'd suggest change it to "Must". (Now, this is NOT covered by
> R036!)
> [jeffsch: I agree that this is part of a general Web Service definition,
> but I don't agree that this is appropriate to describe in WSDL; it seems
> to border on orchestration.]
>
> -- Igor Sedukhin .. (Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com)
Received on Friday, 5 April 2002 10:05:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:24:57 GMT