>Looking I see that in the definition of OWL Full Consistent in section >4.1.2 I have linked datatype map into the direct semantics which does not >follow the convention I described above - perhaps I ought to link that to >RDF Semantics too (without any explicit mention). This seems to be a good idea. > >(I suspect I am out of time) > >> One alternative would be to link to Section 5.2 of S&AS (i.e., >> rdfs.html#5.2) in this case, although I realise that this doesn't >> provide a full definition of a datatype map. I am happy to leave it to >> your judgement > > >The text I circulated earlier is OK - but I will fix the three other >mentions of datatype theory that Herman found. If I am encouraged to I'll >change the hyperlink from datatype map in the HermanReceived on Friday, 30 January 2004 09:22:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:45 GMT