RE: Proposed response to: OWL Web Ontology Language Reference Editorial Comments

> [[
> In OWL Lite the subject must be a class named and the object mist be
> either a class name or a property restriction.
> ]]

There are 2 typos:  "class named" should presumably be "class name", and
"mist" should be "must".

Otherwise, this all looks good to me.

	Mike