W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > January 2004

RE: Proposed response to: OWL Web Ontology Language Reference Editorial Comments

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 14:44:22 +0100
To: "Guus Schreiber" <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>, "WebOnt WG" <www-webont-wg@w3.org>

> You're right. It is stated correctly in Sec. 8,3 but we forgot to update 
> the text  in this section. The last sentence of the note now reads:
> [[
> In OWL Lite the subject must be a class named and the object mist be 
> either a class name or a property restriction.
> ]]


I think it is correct in the new draft

Received on Thursday, 22 January 2004 08:48:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:56 UTC