W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > February 2004

Re: RDF and OWL "REC" documents

From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 16:40:19 +0100
Message-ID: <4027A9E3.9010908@cs.vu.nl>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>

Sandro,

OWL Reference looks fine.

Could you make sure the owl.rdf file at:

   http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl

gets updated?
The REC version is at:

   http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/public/owl.rdf

I would appreciate it if you could check the URIs in the ontology 
header. You might also want to remove the CVS info at the start of the 
file. I guess it wouldn't be a problem if this file gets updated today.

Guus



Sandro Hawke wrote:

> Would all editors please look over their docs and/or diffs and let me
> know ASAP if there's anything terribly wrong with them?  I've done
> various edits to get links to point to the right places (and in a few
> cases as requested) and it's possible I broke something in the
> process.   The cost of changes is very high, but if I broke anything,
> I do want to fix it.
> 
> RDF:
>    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/
>    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/diffs/20031215-20040210/
> 
> OWL:
>    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/TR/
>    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/diffs
>  
> Note that all the links like 
> 
>     http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/staging/$shortname
>     http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-$shortname-20030117
>     http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/TR/STAGE-$shortname
> 
> are fine; they will be rewritten to point to the frozen-in-time TR
> documents as the documents are moved.
> 
>      -- sandro
> 

-- 
Free University Amsterdam, Computer Science
De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 444 7739/7718
E-mail: schreiber@cs.vu.nl
Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/
Received on Monday, 9 February 2004 10:42:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:03 GMT