W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > February 2004

RE: RDF and OWL "REC" documents

From: Smith, Michael K <michael.smith@eds.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:27:55 -0600
Message-ID: <2928D6FE55D5584390909578CAC8397D07B7FD68@usplm216.txpln.us.eds.com>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, www-webont-wg@w3.org

Sandro,

As far as I can tell, it looks fine.  Thanks for all your work.

- Mike

Michael K. Smith (+1-512-404-6683)



-----Original Message-----
From: Sandro Hawke [mailto:sandro@w3.org] 
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 4:16 PM
To: www-webont-wg@w3.org; w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Subject: RDF and OWL "REC" documents




Would all editors please look over their docs and/or diffs and let me
know ASAP if there's anything terribly wrong with them?  I've done
various edits to get links to point to the right places (and in a few
cases as requested) and it's possible I broke something in the
process.   The cost of changes is very high, but if I broke anything,
I do want to fix it.

RDF:
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/diffs/20031215-20040210/

OWL:
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/TR/
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/diffs
 
Note that all the links like 

    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/staging/$shortname
    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-$shortname-20030117
    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/TR/STAGE-$shortname

are fine; they will be rewritten to point to the frozen-in-time TR
documents as the documents are moved.

     -- sandro
Received on Friday, 6 February 2004 17:28:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:03 GMT