W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > September 2003

Re: description-logic/consistency605

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 14:11:25 +0200
To: "Jeremy Carroll <jjc" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF74DA5F73.CE9CED01-ONC1256DA0.00427993-C1256DA0.0042F60A@agfa.be>


Jeremy:
> Charles:
> > Note the two instances of /2002/07/owl#FunctionalProperty - is that
correct?
> > I don't think so.
> > I would be surprised if anyones parser would pass this.
>
>  </rdfs:subPropertyOf>
>   <rdf:type rdf:resource="/2002/07/owl#FunctionalProperty"/>
>  </owl:ObjectProperty>
>  <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="http://oiled.man.example.net/test#rxa"/>
>  <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="http://oiled.man.example.net/test#rx">
>   <rdf:type rdf:resource="/2002/07/owl#FunctionalProperty"/>
>  </owl:ObjectProperty>
>
> > Can someone in the know check this out?
>
>
> Technically these are fine.
>
> The form /2002/07/owl#FunctionalProperty is a relative URI which resolves

> against the base URI of
> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/description-logic/consistent605
>
> as
> http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#FunctionalProperty
>
> I agree these forms are surpising, we could modify
> http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test/#style
> appendix B stylistic preferences,
> perhaps by adding a sentence to section B.2 on xml:base e.g.
>
> [[
> Relative URIs used in the tests should not begin with "/" or ".".
> ]]
>
> If we agreed that then the change to description-logic-605 and and other
> affected tests would be editorial.
>
> Anyone else have an opinion.

As it is right now, it works for me (thanks to HP Jena and W3C Cwm).


--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Saturday, 13 September 2003 08:11:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:02 GMT