W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > September 2003

RE: OWL Test Results page, built from RDF

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 13:40:56 +0200
To: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: "Sean Bechhofer" <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BHEGLCKMOHGLGNOKPGHDOEAFCCAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>


>
> > For each proposed test, in my view, we should do one of:
> >
> > a) approve it
> > b) obsolete it (no explanation needed)
> > c) move it to extra credit.
>
> Um, how is "extra credit" signified?  It looks like part of the test
> name now; shouldn't it be a status, a kind of Approved?
>

That's an interesting idea - I missed this earlier:

<test:status>EXTRACREDIT</test:status>

(implies <test:status>APPROVED</test:status>)

that works I think; also fits with my earlier message today about the
nonentailments.

Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2003 07:49:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:02 GMT