W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > September 2003

Re: OWL Test Results page, built from RDF

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:13:11 -0400
Message-Id: <200309101813.h8AIDBJg023712@roke.hawke.org>
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: "Sean Bechhofer" <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>, www-webont-wg@w3.org

> For each proposed test, in my view, we should do one of:
> a) approve it
> b) obsolete it (no explanation needed)
> c) move it to extra credit.

Um, how is "extra credit" signified?  It looks like part of the test
name now; shouldn't it be a status, a kind of Approved?

      -- sandro
Received on Wednesday, 10 September 2003 14:14:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:55 UTC