W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > September 2003

Reporting Test Results (was Re: Regrets for 2003-09-04 telecon)

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 11:02:06 -0400
Message-Id: <200309041502.h84F26Y7006979@roke.hawke.org>
To: "Charles White" <Charles.White@networkinference.com>
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org


Charles White writes:
> Won't make it today. 
> 
> The test compilation is coming along however.
> If anyone else has done tests, please forward them to me.
> 
> I have completed wonderweb and Euler.
> Am working on Cerebra.
> Still haven't received the pellet results.

I should have tried harder to talk to you about this last week, in
response to your call for results [2].   (Or I should have offered to
do it, in the meeting, but I wasn't able to commit to it at the time.) 

Have you seen my message of this morning, announcing my
RDF-based-results-viewer [1]?  I'm rather motivated to get people
using RDF for this -- we can write whatever tabulators and summary
systems we want, and people can include timing and other details if
they want.  I imagine there will be a demand well beyond W3C process
requirements for this kind of information, surveying the landscape of
OWL reasoners.  It seems like a perfect Semantic Web Application.

In today's meeting, I was going to ask which people who have submitted
results would rather 
    (1) try to re-do theirs using the test-results ontology I'm using,  
or
    (2) have me (or someone) transform their results to use this
    ontology

My hope is that with the CGI results viewer I wrote, it'll be easy/fun
enough for folks to just generate & public the RDF themselves.

   -- sandro



[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Sep/0028.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Aug/0114.html
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2003 11:02:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:02 GMT