W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > October 2003

RE: Ontology premises004

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:47:27 +0100
To: "Sean Bechhofer" <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BHEGLCKMOHGLGNOKPGHDCECKCCAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>


With the recent changes to S&AS I guess you could also leave some of the
triples outside any ontology ... (or maybe not, I've not stuidied the
changes).

But yes - my reading is that you get two ontologies and you can divide the
directives arbitrarily between them

Jeremy


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Bechhofer [mailto:seanb@cs.man.ac.uk]
> Sent: 13 October 2003 12:00
> To: Jeremy Carroll
> Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Ontology premises004
>
>
>
> I am intrigued by Ontology-004. The RDF has two owl:Ontology triples. I
> assume here this is a situation where I simply choose which of the two
> ontologies contains the assertions that then map to the resulting triples?
>
> In other words, I construct ontology object with URI http://example.org
> and one with URI http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/Ontology/premises004.rdf. I
> can then put the directives into either of these ontologies, or I could
> split them between the two.
>
> Is this right? If not, can someone tell me what the abstract syntax looks
> like that produces this particular set of triples....
>
> 	Sean
>
> --
> Sean Bechhofer
> seanb@cs.man.ac.uk
> http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 27 October 2003 09:53:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:02 GMT