- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:47:27 +0100
- To: "Sean Bechhofer" <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
With the recent changes to S&AS I guess you could also leave some of the triples outside any ontology ... (or maybe not, I've not stuidied the changes). But yes - my reading is that you get two ontologies and you can divide the directives arbitrarily between them Jeremy > -----Original Message----- > From: Sean Bechhofer [mailto:seanb@cs.man.ac.uk] > Sent: 13 October 2003 12:00 > To: Jeremy Carroll > Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org > Subject: Ontology premises004 > > > > I am intrigued by Ontology-004. The RDF has two owl:Ontology triples. I > assume here this is a situation where I simply choose which of the two > ontologies contains the assertions that then map to the resulting triples? > > In other words, I construct ontology object with URI http://example.org > and one with URI http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/Ontology/premises004.rdf. I > can then put the directives into either of these ontologies, or I could > split them between the two. > > Is this right? If not, can someone tell me what the abstract syntax looks > like that produces this particular set of triples.... > > Sean > > -- > Sean Bechhofer > seanb@cs.man.ac.uk > http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb > > >
Received on Monday, 27 October 2003 09:53:54 UTC