- From: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:36:30 +0100
- To: W3C WebOnt Working Group <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
I came across the following in an example that somebody was trying to
validate.
I find at http://foo.bar/ontology.owl the following:
<rdf:RDF ..usual stuff..>
<owl:Ontology rdf:about="">
<owl:imports rdf:resource="http://ontos-r-us.com/ontologies/stuff.owl"/>
</owl:Ontology>
</rdf:RDF>
At http://ontos-r-us.com/ontologies/stuff.owl we find:
<rdf:RDF ..usual stuff..
xml:base="http://ontos-r-us.com/ontologies/stuff">
<owl:Ontology rdf:about=""/>
</rdf:RDF>
Now we discover that http://foo.bar/ontology.owl is *not* Lite as there
is an ontology triple that has an untyped object. I guess this is
probably something that's going to cause problems as servers do content
negotiation....
Should we put a test case in for this?
Sean
--
Sean Bechhofer
seanb@cs.man.ac.uk
http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2003 16:40:30 UTC