I came across the following in an example that somebody was trying to validate. I find at http://foo.bar/ontology.owl the following: <rdf:RDF ..usual stuff..> <owl:Ontology rdf:about=""> <owl:imports rdf:resource="http://ontos-r-us.com/ontologies/stuff.owl"/> </owl:Ontology> </rdf:RDF> At http://ontos-r-us.com/ontologies/stuff.owl we find: <rdf:RDF ..usual stuff.. xml:base="http://ontos-r-us.com/ontologies/stuff"> <owl:Ontology rdf:about=""/> </rdf:RDF> Now we discover that http://foo.bar/ontology.owl is *not* Lite as there is an ontology triple that has an untyped object. I guess this is probably something that's going to cause problems as servers do content negotiation.... Should we put a test case in for this? Sean -- Sean Bechhofer seanb@cs.man.ac.uk http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanbReceived on Wednesday, 22 October 2003 16:40:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:02 GMT