> Along with this reorganization, we would like to propose modifying the 30 or > so tests that are OWL Full instead of OWL DL simply because of the lack of de > claration of classes. As I think I mentioned, if the change is made, we can c > lassify and handle the accompanying entailment test. We discussed this last w > eek, but seem to have come to no conclusion on that, and I also didn't see an > y comments on the topic in the minutes. (Actually, I think it is included in > the note "Long Discussion".) I will submit the list of tests that we think sh > ould be changed before thursday. Is this what Jack Berkowitz is talking about [1] when he says "pending the resolution of outstanding issues"? Or is that something else? -- sandro [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Oct/0003Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2003 12:14:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:02 GMT