- From: Jane Hunter <jane@dstc.edu.au>
- Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 08:31:22 +1000
- To: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
YES for DSTC > > Our decision on 13 November to request advancement to PR [1] was based > in part on my suggestion that we could keep making changes to the test > suite during PR and even after Rec. This suggestion was probably > misleading, and I apologize. During PR, we should only make changes > based on new information. After Rec, any changes are handled as > normative errata [2], requiring review by the members and a director's > decision recognizing consensus. What other groups have done (and this > is what confused me) is make a *non-normative* test suite, not part of > their recommendation, which they maintain outside the W3C Rec track > review process. We are free to do that, of course. > > In light of this, DanC, Guus, and I met (we were unable to reach > JimH) and hereby ask for a decision via e-mail to approve the output > of the 20 November meeting [3], recognizing that these will be the > last changes to the normative test suite except for possible changes > due to new information during PR and normative errata. > ...
Received on Thursday, 27 November 2003 17:31:30 UTC