Re: RDF schema of OWL

> This incorporates a suggestion from Dave Beckett [1] to change 
> rdfs:seeAlso to rdfs:isDefinedBy. I remember some problems with the 
> latter option, but cannot recollect the details. Any thoughts?

I remember Peter being very against isDefinedBy when the social meaning 
question was still up in the air (I suppose it still is, but not quite as 
high up)

I am not sure whether the WG home page defines anything very much ... seeAlso 
seems less committed. Personally I guess I see the terms as defined by S&AS, 
and would feel more comfortable with the isDefinedBy if it pointed to that 
(not sure whether it should be the dated or undated version though).

Jeremy