W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > May 2003

comments with different status from Jim's [was Re: WOWG: IMPORTANT - LC Comments List - Look for your name]

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 10:05:32 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20030530.100532.100203140.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: hendler@cs.umd.edu
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org

Here are a bunch of comments where my view of the status is
significantly different from Jim's (including one where the status just
changed). 

peter



---> OWL Abstract Syntax and Semantics review comments (Fri, May 09 2003)
	[no reply received] - Peter?   
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0050.html

On 9 May 2003, I sent message
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0112.html with a
proposed reply for this message.  I am waiting for a response from Guus on
this, as per our process.

---> Comments from RDFCore on S+AS (Fri, May 09 2003) [no reply received] -
	discussed, but not answered - Peter? 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0052.html

On 9 May 2003, I sent message
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0110.html with a
proposed reply for this message.  I am waiting for a response from both Jim
and Guus on this, as per our process.

---> OWL S&AS comment - owl:Ontology mapping to/from RDF triples (Fri, May
	09 2003) [no reply received] - Note - this is mistitled - Peter, please
	look at it. 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0057.html

On 14 May 2003, I sent message
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0207.html with a
proposed reply for this message.  I am waiting for a response from Guus on
this, as per our process.

---> OWL S&AS: Translation to RDF Graphs (Fri, May 09 2003) [no reply
	received] - adressed by Sean's document, needs assignment. 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0059.html

On 14 May 2003, I sent message
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0211.html with a
proposed reply for this message.  I am waiting for a response from Guus on
this, as per our process.

---> Fwd: Jena comment: Syntax Checker Implementation Report] (Mon, May 12
	2003) [no reply received] - this is an S&AS comment, Peter?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0083.html

On 30 May 2003, I sent message
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0417.html with a
proposed reply for this message.  


---> Some comments on OWL S&AS (Sat, Apr 05 2003)  - ongoing discussion w pfps
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0023.html

I just sent another message closing this thread.  (It might have been
closed already, but I suppose that reclosing can't hurt.)




Here are two comments that I may take up shortly.



---> Review section 4.1 of OWL AS&S (Fri, May 09 2003) [no reply received]
	- Peter? 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0055.html

---> Semantics and Abstract Syntax (and some general OWL Lite, CR, &
	implementation) comments (Fri, May 09 2003) [no reply received]
	several comments, mostly editorial, on contentive -- Peter?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0069.html
Received on Friday, 30 May 2003 10:05:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:00 GMT