W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > May 2003


From: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 11:57:43 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time)
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.44.0305291156580.616-100000@potato>

On Thu, 29 May 2003, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

> Sean Bechhofer wrote:
> >
> > In the process of documenting my implementations, I have produced the
> > following:
> >
> > http://wonderweb.man.ac.uk/owl/rdf.shtml
> I glanced at this and thought it was pretty good, distinctly more readable
> than the stuff I produce. There were one or two technical mistakes, I can
> give a detailed review if the group wants (e.g. owl:equivalentClass
> inadequately handled).

This would certainly be useful for me.

> We perhaps need to have consensus on which technical changes we are making
> to OWL, since they tend to show up in this sort of document.
> I think with this appraoch we are unlikely to get everything 100% spot on,
> so it would be good to have this in a document either which is updatable or
> with an errata page so we can fix it into the future.



Sean Bechhofer
Received on Thursday, 29 May 2003 06:58:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:00 GMT