W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > May 2003

Re: TEST: last call candidate

From: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 22:23:31 +0100
Message-ID: <16066.46035.993007.222334@merlin.horrocks.net>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org

On May 14, Jeremy Carroll writes:
> 
> >     oiled     http://oiled.man.example.uk/test#
> 
> I had changed it from oiled.man.ac.uk; I believed that the URI is fine.
> 
> (Pubrules excepts it as OK)
> 
> However reading the RFC
> 
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2606.txt
> 
> I discover that example.uk is not reserved, and I should have used one of
>   example.org
>   example.com
>   example.net
>   example
> 
> 
> I believe pubrules would barf on oiled.man.example, so I propose to use 
> oiled.man.example.net
> 
> I am assuming that Sean and Ian prefer to have some (subtle) credit given to 
> the oiled tool ....

I suppose I would prefer it, but I don't feel very strongly about
it. Sean may have different ideas.

Ian

> 
> Otherwise, we could just make it 
> 
> xmlns:eg = "http://example.net/"
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2003 17:23:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:00 GMT