W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > May 2003

Re: TEST: last call candidate

From: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 08:59:47 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time)
To: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.44.0305150855030.2056-100000@potato>

On Wed, 14 May 2003, Ian Horrocks wrote:

>
> On May 14, Jeremy Carroll writes:
> >
> > >     oiled     http://oiled.man.example.uk/test#
> >
> > I had changed it from oiled.man.ac.uk; I believed that the URI is fine.
> >
> > (Pubrules excepts it as OK)
> >
> > However reading the RFC
> >
> > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2606.txt
> >
> > I discover that example.uk is not reserved, and I should have used one of
> >   example.org
> >   example.com
> >   example.net
> >   example
> >
> >
> > I believe pubrules would barf on oiled.man.example, so I propose to use
> > oiled.man.example.net
> >
> > I am assuming that Sean and Ian prefer to have some (subtle) credit given to
> > the oiled tool ....
>
> I suppose I would prefer it, but I don't feel very strongly about
> it. Sean may have different ideas.

Any publicity is, of course, nice, so including the reference to oiled
would be preferable. At this point, however, I'd be prepared to see
http://example.net if that's what's needed to push it through.

	Sean

-- 
Sean Bechhofer
seanb@cs.man.ac.uk
http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2003 04:04:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:00 GMT