- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 13 May 2003 10:57:11 -0500
- To: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
- Cc: Mike Dean <mdean@bbn.com>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
On Mon, 2003-05-12 at 05:50, Guus Schreiber wrote: > Mike Dean wrote: > > > Below is a proposed response to [1]. > > > > Mike > > > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0073.html > > > > Dick, > > > > Thanks for your feedback on the OWL Reference. > > > > > >>The xmlns URI for rdfs ends with "#", > >>but the imports URI for rdfs does not. > >> > >>Shouldn't they be the same? > > > > > > No. Recall that the xmlns URI is a prefix preprended to a > > local name to form the URI of a Resource within the > > namespace (document), while owl:imports refers to the > > namespace (document) itself. Recall from where? As I mentioned privately to Guus, let's please explain using words from the spec. (a) in doing so, you might find that your own understanding was wrong (b) you might find that the spec is wrong or misleading and really should be fixed (c) in any case, you'll get *the text of the spec* reviewed by yourself and the commentor. We can count this one as water under the bridge (unless the commentor asks for more) but let's remember for next time to base our replies on the text of the specs and/or the decision record. > > > > Mike > > Sorry, Mike. I already responded on the comments list, as I considered > this just a matter of explanation: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0080.html > > Well, at least our responses were consistent... > > Guus > > > > > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2003 11:59:13 UTC