W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > May 2003

Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 13 May 2003 10:22:21 -0500
To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
Cc: webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1052839341.20120.304.camel@dirk.dm93.org>

On Tue, 2003-05-13 at 10:04, Dan Connolly wrote:
[...]
> > I'm happy to work on a better answer, but you don't suggest any text 
> > for the meat of his comments,
> 
> I haven't found the decisions yet.

The 12 Dec decision to close 5.23 included an action for Ian
to elaborate on justification, which he did:

Complexity and implementability of OWL languages
From: Ian Horrocks (horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Thu, Dec 19 2002
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Dec/0239.html

I'll have a go at making the issues list more clear about
our decision rationale so that we can just point Mr. Merry
at that...
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#I5.23-hasValue-in-owl



-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2003 11:24:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:00 GMT